Reliability of CNEURO hyssops for sample collection in the SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis / Fiabilidad de los hisopos CNEURO para la recogida de muestras en el diagnóstico del SARS-CoV-2

ABSTRACT Introduction: The detection of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material from nasopharyngeal swab samples by RT-PCR is the most specific and sensitive way to test suspected cases. However, factors such as the sampling process, the type of hyssop used, and the anatomical area from which the sample is collected can distort the result and cause false negatives. Objective: To evaluate the reliability of CNUERO hyssops for sample collection for the SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis versus IMPROSWAB hyssops. Material and Methods: To study the reliability of hyssops developed in Cuba for swabbing for the COVID-19 diagnosis by comparing them to other hyssops successfully used for this task, 2 swabbing samples were obtained from each patient (136). One of these two samples was taken using the hyssops made in Cuba, while the other was taken using another hyssop imported from Germany. The positive detections obtained with the use of both hyssops were compared using the Fisher's exact test. The result of the detection of each hyssop was evaluated and compared using the ROC curve. Results: The use of CNEURO hyssops allowed the detection of 45 out of 59 positive cases, while IMPROSAWAB hyssops detected 52 out of 59 true positive cases. There were no significant differences between positive cases detected with the use of each hyssop. The sensitivity of sample detection using CNEURO hyssops was 76,3 % while the one using IMPROSWAB hyssops was 88,1 %. Hence, there are no significant differences in the detection of cases using these two hyssops. Conclusion: CNEURO hyssops are safe and reliable to be used to take nasopharyngeal samples from COVID-19 patients.

RESUMEN Introducción: La detección de material genético del SARS-CoV-2 a partir de muestras de hisopos nasofaríngeos mediante RT-PCR es la forma más específica y sensible de analizar los casos sospechosos. Sin embargo, factores como el proceso de toma de muestra, el tipo de hisopo y el área anatómica de la que se extrae la muestra, pueden distorsionar el resultado y provocar falsos negativos. Objetivo: Evaluar la confiabilidad de hisopos CNUERO para la recolección de muestras en el diagnóstico de SARS-CoV-2 versus hisopos IMPROSWAB. Material y Métodos: Se obtuvieron 2 muestras de exudado de cada paciente (136). Una de estas dos muestras se tomó con hisopos CNEURO, mientras que la otra se tomó con el hisopo IMPROSWAB. Las detecciones positivas entre ambos hisopos se compararon mediante la prueba exacta de Fisher. El resultado de la detección de cada hisopo se evaluó y comparó utilizando la curva ROC. Resultados: El uso de hisopos CNEURO permitió detectar 45 de 59 casos positivos, mientras que los hisopos IMPROSAWAB detectaron 52 de 59 casos verdaderos positivos. Se detectaron diferencias no significativas entre los casos positivos detectados entre hisopos. La sensibilidad de detección de muestras utilizando hisopos CNEURO fue del 76,3 % y del 88,1 % cuando se utilizaron hisopos IMPROSWAB. Por tanto, no se detectaron diferencias significativas en la detección de casos utilizando estos dos hisopos. Conclusión: Los hisopos CNEURO son seguros y fiables para su uso en la toma de muestras nasofaríngeas de pacientes con COVID-19.

Comparison between nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva as reliable specimens for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 / Comparación de la confiabilidad del diagnóstico del SARS-CoV-2 entre muestras de hisopado y saliva

Introduction: The SARS-CoV-2 virus is a positive-strand RNA virus. The virus can also be detected in many different specimens as throat swabs, nasal swabs, sputum, saliva, blood, etc. Objective: The aim of this paper is to compare the reliability of different types of specimen collection, saliva and swabs samples for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Material and Methods: A sample of 22 COVID-19 positive patients was selected. Paired samples from saliva, nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal + oropharyngeal swabs were collected on the 7th day after diagnosis. The hyssops and medium employed was IMPROSWAB and IMPROVIRAL NAT Medium, Germany. The sample evaluation was conducted through RT-PCR. The results were compared using Fisher's exact test and ROC curve. The gold standard proposed in this paper was the nasopharyngeal + oropharyngeal swabs specimen. Results: The gold standard method detected 10 true positive cases, of which oropharyngeal swabs, nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva only detected three positive cases. Significant differences (Fisher's exact test p = 0.003) were detected in the comparison between saliva and the gold standart proposed. The ROC curve analysis showed that saliva had an area under the curve of 0.650, with a 30 percent of sensibility. However, the nasopharyngeal and nasopharyngeal + oropharyngeal samples had an area under curve of 0.950 and 1.000, respectively, with a sensibility of 90 percent and 100 percent, respectively. Conclusion: Saliva samples are not a reliable specimen for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection. In turn, the most reliable specimens are nasopharyngeal and nasopharyngeal + oropharyngeal samples collected by swabbing(AU)

Introducción: El SARS-CoV-2 es un virus ARN positivo. Este virus puede ser detectado en diferentes tipos de secreción como hisopada bucal, nasal, esputo, saliva, sangre, etc. Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es comparar la confiabilidad de diferentes tipos de muestras, saliva y exudado, en la detección de SARS-CoV-2. Material y Métodos: Una muestra de 22 pacientes con diagnóstico de Covid-19 fue estudiada. Se tomaron muestras pareadas de saliva y exudado nasofaríngeo y orofaríngeo en cada paciente. Se emplearon los hisopos y medios de la firma alemana IMPROVE®. Los resultados de las determinaciones por RT-PCR se compararon mediante test de Fisher (test de la probabilidad exacta de Fisher) y cada sets de muestras fue evaluada individualmente y luego comparadas por curvas ROC. El estándar de oro propuesto fue el doble hisopado nasofaríngeo/orofaríngeo. Resultados: El método de oro propuesto detectó 10 casos positivos. La coincidencia de detección entre todos los sets de muestras fue de 3 casos (30 por ciento). Se obtuvieron diferencias significativas (Fisher p = 0.003) en la comparación de los casos detectados en saliva vs el estándar de oro. El análisis de curvas ROC mostró un área bajo la curva de 0.650 (30 por ciento de sensibilidad) para la saliva. En el caso del hisopado nasofaríngeo y el estándar de oro mostraron un área bajo la curva de 0.95 y 1.00, respectivamente, con una sensibilidad del 90 (AU) por ciento y 100 por ciento, respectivamente. Conclusiones: La saliva no es una muestra confiable para la detección de SARS-CoV-2. La muestra más confiable para el diagnóstico fue el hisopado nasofaríngeo y el doble hisopado(AU)

Assessment of IL-28: rs12979860 and rs8099917 Polymorphisms in a Cohort of Cuban Chronic HCV Genotype 1b Patients.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a significant global public health problem with >185 million infections worldwide. A series of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) has identified IL-28B polymorphisms as a predictor of sustained virologic response (SVR), as well as spontaneous clearance in chronic HCV genotype 1 patients. The objective of this work was to evaluate the prevalence of IL-28B rs12979860 and rs8099917 polymorphisms in Cuban chronic HCV patients. The study cohort included 73 chronic HCV patients treated with concomitant administration of CIGB-230 and nonpegylated IFN-α plus ribavirin (non-pegIFN-α/R) antiviral therapy. The genotype distribution of IL-28B rs12979860CC, -CT, and -TT was 29, 41, and 30%, respectively, and the distribution for rs8099917TT, -TG, and -GG was 63, 31, and 5%, respectively. The allele frequencies for rs12979860C and -T alleles were 51 and 49%, respectively, and for rs8099917G and -T alleles, the values were 21 and 79%, respectively. SVR rates were 55, 42, and 35% for rs12979860CC, -CT, and -TT, respectively, and 52, 30, and 25% for rs8099917TT, -GT, and -GG, respectively. The combined assessment of both single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) resulted in 3 major genotypes (rs12979860CC/rs8099917TT, rs12979860CT/rs8099917TT, and rs12979860CT/rs8099917GG) with a frequency of 30.1, 21.9, and 20.5%, respectively. In patients with heterozygous variant rs12979860CT, the additional genotyping of rs8099917 contributed to increase the SVR rate. It is concluded that in Cuban HCV-infected patients, the responder homogeneous variant rs8099917TT is the most frequent genotype. The simultaneous genotyping of 2 IL-28B SNPs could improve the prediction of SVR contributing to better therapeutic decisions and treatment management.

Relationship of type 1 diabetes to ancestral proportions and HLA DR/DQ alleles in a sample of the admixed Cuban population.

BACKGROUND: Incidence of type 1 diabetes varies widely around the world, probably due to ethnic differences across populations among other factors. AIMS: To determine whether there is an association between disease and ancestry proportions; and to control disease-HLA associations for possible confounding by admixture or population stratification. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 100 cases and 129 controls participated in the study. Ancestry informative markers, which have considerable differences in frequency between European, West African and Native American populations were used. Type 1 diabetes associated HLA susceptibility/protection alleles were ascertained by PCR using specific primers. Statistical analyses were conducted using STRUCTURE 2.1, ADMIXMAP 3.7, SPSS 16.0 and STRAT 1.0 packages. RESULTS: The results of logistic regression implemented in ADMIXMAP 3.7 indicated that European ancestry was associated with type 1 diabetes mellitus with an odds ratio of 5.7 corresponding to one unit change in European admixture proportion. Association was found between HLA alleles and disease, DQA1*0501, *0301 DQB1*0201 and DRB1*0301, *0401 being susceptibility alleles and DRB1*1501, DQA1*0102/3 and DQB1*0602 being protective alleles. CONCLUSIONS: We found an association between European ancestry and type 1 diabetes in our sample, indicating the contribution of ethnicity to incidence differences. Previously reported associations of HLA DR/DQ alleles with disease are confirmed for the admixed Cuban population.

ACE I/D polymorphism study in a Cuban hypertensive population.

BACKGROUND: The angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is a key protein of the renin angiotensin system, whose main function is the conversion of angiotensin I to II. ACE is involved in the physiological control of blood pressure and it is a candidate gene for essential hypertension in humans. We tested the relevance of the ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in our population. METHODS: We recruited 243 hypertensive and 407 normotensive subjects in the city of Havana, matched according to age, sex and ethnic group. The ACE (I/D) polymorphism was determined by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. The fit of genotype frequencies to Hardy-Weinberg proportions was evaluated in all groups analyzed. The possible association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and hypertension status was tested by chi2 and odds ratio tests. RESULTS: All groups but black female cases were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The frequencies of the D allele in hypertensive/normotensive subjects were 0.61/0.59 in white males, 0.58/0.58 in white females, 0.47/0.59 in black males and 0.58/0.54 in black females. The distribution of ACE genotypes differed significantly between cases and controls only in black women according to the additive model (chi2p=0.04) but the adjusted OR did not show significant association (OR 1.14 95% CI 0.62 to 2.10). CONCLUSION: The ACE I/D polymorphism was not associated with hypertension in our multiethnic sample. While the chi2 test for additive model in black women suggested a marginal significance, the adjusted OR did not show any significant association.

HLA DQA1*0501 and DQB1*02 in Cuban celiac patients.

Celiac disease (CD) susceptibility has been strongly associated with HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8. The main objective of this study was to assess the distribution of HLA DQA1*0501 and DQB1*02 alleles (DQ2) for the first time in a group of Cuban celiac patients. We evaluated 22 patients, 54 first-degree relatives, and 60 controls for detection of antitissue transglutaminase (tTG)-specific antibodies in serum. We found that 100% of the probands and 19% of the first-degree relatives were positive for the antibodies in serum. We did not detect any specific response for the healthy control individuals. We observed a significant over-representation of DQ2 heterodimer, both in patients and relatives. In the group of patients, 86.3% were positive for DQA1*0501, 90.2% were positive for DQB1*02, and 86.3% were positive for both alleles. The frequencies in relatives and controls were as follows: 70%, 90%, and 70%; and 56.6%, 45%, and 20%, respectively. In conclusion, we found that the proportion of our celiac patients carrying DQ2 was similar to the proportion of CD patients reported in populations with different genetic backgrounds. These results underline the primary importance of HLA-DQ alleles in susceptibility to celiac disease.